RAPID/Roadmap/14-FD-a

From Open Energy Information

< RAPID‎ | Roadmap

RAPIDRegulatory and Permitting Information Desktop Toolkit
My Projects

Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit (14-FD-a)

Information current as of 2023
A person (developer) must obtain a Section 404 Approval from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to discharge dredge or fill material into waters of the United States. 33 U.S.C. § 403. The USACE regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States pursuant to the Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Title 33 CFR 323 Permits for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material Into Waters of the United States. In regulating the discharge of dredged or fill material, the USACE has developed multiple general permits to authorize common activities that have minimum impacts to waters of the United States. These general permits are an expeditious way to receive authorization for a project that has been designed to meet the terms and conditions of the general permit.


The USACE uses three types of general permits: Nationwide Permits, Regional General Permits, and Programmatic General Permits. Not all USACE district offices use all three types of general permits. In addition, many districts have placed regional conditions on their Nationwide Permits. Therefore, a developer should verify which district the proposed project is located in and then contact the district office to determine if the district’s Nationwide Permit has any additional regional conditions. The district offices can also answer any questions regarding the terms and conditions and/or applicability of a certain general permit to a proposed activity. Some general permits do not require any notification to USACE to use them while others may require notice to and verification from USACE prior to use.

When a project activity does not meet the terms and conditions of a general permit, an individual permit is required. The individual permit can be a Letter of Permission that is also an abbreviated process that is primarily used for certain activities that fall squarely under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). Section 10 reviews under the Rivers and Harbors Act and reviews pursuant to Section 404 under the CWA are primarily the same, except for projects that require an alternatives analysis under the Section 404(b)(1).

The other type of individual permit is a Standard Individual Permit and is most often just called an “Individual Permit.” This process is more detailed and is the primary focus of the remainder of this section and the associated flowchart.

Note: Regardless of the type of permit, USACE must also comply with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, and its Tribal Trust Responsibilities. Additional information may be required from the developer for USACE to comply with these laws but such processes are not discussed in detail in this section since they are applicable to any federal action associated with the proposed activity. For more information, see:

On-Site Evaluation Overview: 10


USACE may require compensatory mitigation for impacts to aquatic resources regardless of permit type. See 33 C.F.R. § 332 for more information.

The discussion below and flowchart assume that the developer already knows a permit is required. In cases where the developer is unsure if an aquatic feature, such as a wetland, at the potential project site is jurisdictional and subject to Section 404 permit requirements, the developer should contact the USACE district early in the process to discuss any information that may be needed by USACE to make a jurisdictional determination, such as a wetland delineation report. To avoid delays during the application review process, such information should be provided to USACE as early as practicable.

NOTE: Readers should be aware of the recent Supreme Court decision in Sackett v. EPA and proposed rules on this matter and continue to monitor the issue at the state and national level. On November 18, 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of the Army announced the signing of a proposed rule to revise the definition of “Waters of the United States,” effectively revoking the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. The final rule was published on January 25, 2023 and became effective March 25, 2023. On April 12, 2023, a district court judge in the federal district of North Dakota issued a preliminary injunction of the WOTUS rule in 24 states, preventing the administration of the rule in those states. An additional two states were affected by a previous injunction of the rule, bringing the total number of states in which the rule is stayed to 26. Concurrent to the development of the WOTUS rule, the Supreme Court of the United States granted Certiorari in Sackett v. EPA. In the case, a dispute over the fill of a wetland, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals applied the significant nexus test to find that the wetland was covered by the Clean Water Act. The test used by the Court of Appeals, based on Supreme Court precedent, is largely codified by the Final Rule. The sole issue on appeal in Sackett was whether this significant nexus test was the correct test to apply for determining jurisdiction over wetlands or whether some other test should be used. On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court rejected the significant nexus test. The Court held that federal jurisdiction over wetlands applies only to those wetlands that have “a continuous surface connection to bodies that are ‘waters of the United States’ in their own right, so that there is demarcation between ‘waters’ and wetlands. In light of this decision the EPA and Department of the Army are developing a proposed rule to amend the rule for the “Waters of the United States” definition. The proposed rule is expected to be published in fall 2023. Readers should continue to monitor the issue at the state and national level.

Waters of the United States

In the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin, the new definition of "Waters of the United States" went into effect on March 25, 2023. Under the new rule, “Waters of the United States” are defined as:

  • The territorial seas, and waters which are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;
  • Tributaries;
  • Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters; and
  • Adjacent wetlands. 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(a).

Tributaries must be relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water; or, either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of downstream waters that are subject to the Clean Water Act. 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(a)(3).

Similarly, Wetlands must be relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water with a continuous surface connection to jurisdictional waters; or, either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, must significantly affect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters subject to the Clean Water Act. 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(a)(4). “Wetlands” are defined as “those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.” 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(c)(1).

For both tributaries and wetlands, “Significantly affect” means “A material influence on the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters” subject to the Clean Water Act. To determine whether waters, either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, have a material influence on the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters, the following factors must be assessed:

  • Contribution of flow;
  • Trapping, transformation, filtering, and transport of materials (including nutrients, sediment, and other pollutants);
  • Retention and attenuation of floodwaters and runoff;
  • Modulation of temperature in waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; or
  • Provision of habitat and food resources for aquatic species located in waters subject to the Clean Water Act.

In addition, the following factors must be considered:

  • The distance from a water subject to the Clean Water Act;
  • Hydrologic factors, such as the frequency, duration, magnitude, timing, and rate of hydrologic connections, including shallow subsurface flow;
  • The size, density, or number of waters that have been determined to be similarly situated;
  • Landscape position and geomorphology; and
  • Climatological variables such as temperature, rainfall, and snowpack.

33 C.F.R. § 328.3(c)(6).

In the states of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming, federal district courts have enjoined the EPA's new definition of Waters of the United States. Therefore, in these states, the old definition of "Waters of the United States" currently applies. This definition of "Waters of the United States" includes:

  • The territorial seas, and waters which are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;
  • Tributaries;
  • Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters; and
  • Adjacent wetlands. 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(a).

Tributaries must be perennial or intermittent within a typical year, which the rule defines as a year "when precipitation and other climatic variables are within the normal periodic range for the geographic area of the applicable aquatic resource based on a rolling thirty-year period." 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(c)(13).

"Waters of the United States" do not include:

  • Waters or water features that are not identified in paragraph (a)(1), (2), (3), or (4) of this section;
  • Groundwater, including groundwater drained through subsurface drainage systems;
  • Ephemeral features, including ephemeral streams, swales, gullies, rills, and pools;
  • Diffuse stormwater run-off and directional sheet flow over upland;
  • Ditches that are not waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section, and those portions of ditches constructed in waters identified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section that do not satisfy the conditions of paragraph (c)(1) of this section;
  • Prior converted cropland;
  • Artificially irrigated areas, including fields flooded for agricultural production, that would revert to upland should application of irrigation water to that area cease;
  • Artificial lakes and ponds, including water storage reservoirs and farm, irrigation, stock watering, and log cleaning ponds, constructed or excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters, so long as those artificial lakes and ponds are not impoundments of jurisdictional waters that meet the conditions of paragraph (c)(6) of this section;
  • Water-filled depressions constructed or excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters incidental to mining or construction activity, and pits excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters for the purpose of obtaining fill, sand, or gravel;
  • Stormwater control features constructed or excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters to convey, treat, infiltrate, or store stormwater run-off;
  • Groundwater recharge, water reuse, and wastewater recycling structures, including detention, retention, and infiltration basins and ponds, constructed or excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters; and
  • Waste treatment systems. 33 C.F.R. § 328.3(b).



Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit Process


14-FD-a.1 – Conduct Pre-Application Consultation for Major Applications

USACE will hold a pre-application consultation upon request by developers and in accordance with local procedures. See 33 C.F.R. § 325.1(b). The developer will be required to submit sufficient information to USACE to facilitate the pre-application meeting. Contact the appropriate district for the type of information needed. At the meeting, USACE project manager will provide the developer with information related to the application, including criteria used to assess the project. This process should be brief but thorough enough to allow the potential applicant to begin addressing the viability of some more obvious potential alternatives in the application. More informal pre-application meetings can be held for minor project proposals.

14-FD-a.2 to 14-FD-a.3 – Does the Proposed Activity Qualify for a General Permit?

The developer should first determine if the proposed activity qualifies for a general permit or contact the appropriate district if unsure. If there are no applicable general permits to fit the category of activity contemplated, the developer should contact the appropriate USACE district to determine whether an individual permit is necessary and if so, whether it is a Letter of Permission or a Standard Individual Permit.

Hydropower

There is a nationwide permit for "discharges of dredged or fill material associated with hydropower projects having: (a) Less than 10000 kW (10 MW) of total generating capacity at existing reservoirs, where the project, including the fill, is licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under the Federal Power Act; or (b) a licensing exemption granted by the FERC pursuant to Section 408 of the Energy Security Act of 1980 (16 U.S.C. 2705 and 2708) and Section 30 of the Federal Power Act, as amended." If the project falls within the nationwide permit, the developer need not complete this Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit Application Process but must submit a pre-construction notification to the district engineer prior to commencing activity.

(See USACE 2012 Nationwide Permits at 10).

14-FD-a.4 – Application for Department of the Army Individual Permit (ENG Form 4345)

When an individual permit is required, the developer should submit a complete application to the appropriate USACE district office. The application can be found at Engineering Form 4345. Note some districts may have joint permit applications with local, territorial, or state agencies so please review the appropriate district website for application materials.

According the 33 C.F.R. § 325.1(d)(1), the application must include:

  • A complete description of the proposed activity including necessary drawings, sketches, or plans sufficient for public notice (detailed engineering plans and specifications are not required);
  • The location, purpose and need for the proposed activity;
  • Scheduling of the activity;
  • The names and addresses of adjoining property owners;
  • The location and dimensions of adjacent structures; and
  • A list of authorizations required by other federal, interstate, state, territorial, or local agencies for the work, including all approvals received or denials already made.

Further requirements for specific activities are listed in 33 C.F.R. §§ 325.1(d)(3)-(7) and (9). The application is deemed complete when it contains sufficient information to issue a public notice, as defined by 33 C.F.R. § 325.3(a). See 33 C.F.R. § 325.1(d)(10).

14-FD-a.5 to 14-FD-a.6 – Review Application Materials for Completeness

According to 33 C.F.R. § 325.2(a)(2), the district engineer must review the application for completeness and either issue public notice if complete or notify the applicant if incomplete. The application completeness review and notification must be done within 15 days of receipt of the application.

14-FD-a.7 to 14-FD-a.8 – Prepare and Publish Public Notice of Application; Comment on the Application

Within 15 days or receipt of a complete application, the USACE district office will issue a public notice of the submitted application. See 33 C.F.R. § 325.2(a)(2). The Public notice will be issued in accordance with the standard procedures specified in 33 C.F.R. § 325.3. The notice should include the items listed in 33 C.F.R. § 325.3(a) and a description of factors used to evaluate the application. Any comments received will be sent to the applicant for a response. USACE must address all comments in its Administrative record.

Once the public notice is issued, the district engineer may require the developer to submit additional information that is essential for the USACE to complete its NEPA documentation, public interest review, and, if applicable, an alternatives analysis under Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines and/or to and comply with other laws such as Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

14-FD-a.9 – Hold Public Hearing (Optional)

Whenever a public hearing is needed for USACE to make a permit decision or upon request by any person, in writing, during the comment period, a public hearing will be held on the proposed permit decision. See 33 C.F.R. § 327.4. When a public hearing is requested, USACE will only hold one if it determines such a hearing is necessary to make an informed decision.

14-FD-a.10 to 14-FD-a.11 – Has the Proposed Project Received State 401 Certification?

USACE permits cannot be granted until the WQC is obtained or waived. See 33 C.F.R. § 325.2(b)(ii). Generally, a developer will apply to USACE and the WQC agency at the same time so the reviews can occur concurrently. Some USACE districts and WQC agencies use joint applications and issue joint public notices. Note it is the developer’s responsibility to notify each agency of changes required by another agency that could affect the application.

Under section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) a federal agency may not issue a license or permit—such as those required for a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hydroelectric license or a CWA section 404 permit for dredge and fill activities—without obtaining a water quality certification from the state, tribe with Treatment as a State (TAS) status, or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) having jurisdiction, hereafter collectively termed “Certifying Authority”. CWA 401 water quality certifications verify that the proposed project complies with applicable water quality standards. If the Certifying Authority fails to act within a reasonable time (which shall not exceed one year), the certification requirement may be waived. 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1).

In order to allow the Certifying Authority sufficient time to analyze the impacts of the project on water quality and to meet the deadline for demonstrating compliance with section 401 of the CWA, the developer should request water quality certification from the Certifying Authority early on in the licensing or permitting process.

EPA

The EPA acts on behalf of states or Tribes that do not have the authority to provide such certification. Currently, the EPA fulfills this role in two specific scenarios: first, on behalf of Tribes without "treatment in a similar manner as a state" (TAS) status for Section 401 (refer to the Tribes Approved for Treatment as a State (TAS)); and second, on lands of exclusive federal jurisdiction in relevant respects. Once it is determined that the EPA is indeed the certifying authority, confirm which EPA Region the project is located in. 40 C.F.R. 121.16(a)

EPA Section 401 Water Quality Certification:
14-FD-d

Alaska

In Alaska, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation for projects that require a FERC license or a USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-AK-d

Arkansas

In Arkansas, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality for projects that require a FERC license or a USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-AR-d

California

In California, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the California State Water Resources Control Board and/or the regional water quality control for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-CA-d

Colorado

In Colorado, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-CO-d

Illinois

In Illinois, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-IL-d

Indiana

In Indiana, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-IN-d

Iowa

In Iowa, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Iowa Department of Natural Resources for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-IA-d

Kentucky

In Kentucky, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Kentucky Department of Environmental Protection for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-KY-d

Louisiana

In Louisiana, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-LA-d

Minnesota

In Minnesota, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-MN-d

Mississippi

In Mississippi, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-MS-d

Missouri

In Missouri, the hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-MO-d

New York

In New York, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Resources for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-NY-d

North Dakota

In North Dakota, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-ND-d

Ohio

In Ohio, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-OH-d

Pennsylvania

In Pennsylvania, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-PA-d

Tennessee

In Tennessee, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-TN-d

Vermont

In Vermont, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. Vermont also requires a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver for FERC exempt projects. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-VT-d

Washington

In Washington, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Washington State Department of Ecology for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-WA-d

West Virginia

In West Virginia, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-WV-d

Wisconsin

In Wisconsin, a hydropower developer needs a 401 Water Quality Certification or waiver from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for projects that require a FERC license or USACE approval and may result in any discharge into the navigable waters of the U.S. For more information, see:

401 Water Quality Certification:
14-WI-d

14-FD-a.12 to 14-FD-a.13 – Has the Proposed Project Received a CZMA Consistency Determination?

The developer must also apply for and receive Coastal Zone Management Act consistency determinations from the State, if applicable, prior to USACE rendering a permit decision. It is the responsibility of the developer to apply for and receive such approvals. Again, this can be applied for concurrently with USACE permit application.

For more information regarding CZMA determinations, see:

Coastal Zone Federal Consistency Determination:
13-CA-c

Coastal Zone Federal Consistency Determination:
13-WA-a

14-FD-a.14 to 14-FD-a.15 – Has Environmental Review Been Conducted?

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to consider the potential environmental consequences of their proposed actions and any reasonable alternatives before undertaking a major federal action. The issuance of a permit by a federal agency is considered a major federal action. Consequently, a NEPA analysis must be performed before USACE can render a permit decision.

Depending on the category of activity involved, USACE must complete an Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significance (FONSI), an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), or a Categorical Exclusion (CatEX). See 33 C.F.R. § 325.2(a)(4). Information may be required from the developer for USACE to complete its review.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - NEPA Process:
9-FD-k

For more information regarding NEPA implementation procedures for the USACE’s regulatory program, see 33 C.F.R. § 325, appendix B.

Similar to, and often combined with its NEPA analysis, is the USACE Public Interest Review. USACE must evaluate the proposed project impacts to determine whether or not the proposal is contrary to the public interest. See 33 C.F.R. § 320.4(a). The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the public interest. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects thereof: among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, floodplain values, land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people.

In cases where there is a discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., as regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, USACE must also conduct an alternatives analysis in accordance with the Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. This is a much more stringent requirement than NEPA since under the Guidelines, no discharge shall be permitted if there is a practicable alternative that would have a less adverse impact on the aquatic ecosystem, so long as the alternative does not have other significant adverse environmental consequences. See 40 C.F.R. § 230.10. This is often called the “LEDPA” which is the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative. The alternative must be practicable in terms of cost, logistics and existing technology. USACE will review the proposed project and ensure impacts to aquatic resources are avoided, then minimized, and then appropriately compensated for, in that order. A developer cannot skip a step in the sequence and cannot “buy down” impacts with additional compensatory mitigation. Projects should be designed to avoid aquatic resource impacts to the extent practicable.

For unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources proposed under Section 404, regardless of whether or not the project qualifies for a general or individual permit, USACE may require compensatory mitigation. See 33 C.F.R. § 332.

14-FD-a.16 to 14-FD-a.19 – Prepare Administrative Record; Record of Decision (ROD) or Statement of Findings (SOF)

Once all public hearings and comment periods have concluded, and USACE has completed the analyses outlined above, USACE will prepare the Administrative Record. Before issuing the final permit decision, USACE develops a Record of Decision (ROD) or a Statement of Finding (SOF) depending on whether the environmental process required an EIS or EA. See 33 C.F.R. § 325.2(a)(6).

14-FD-a.20 to 14-FD-a.22 – Is the Permit Approved?; Section 404 Permit

Once the SOF or ROD is complete, the district engineer must either take action on the permit or forward the report, application, administrative record, and recommendation to the authorized officer, in accordance with 33 C.F.R. § 325.8. See 33 C.F.R. § 325.2(a)(6).

If the final decision is to deny the permit, USACE will advise the applicant in writing of the reasons for denial. See 33 C.F.R. § 325.2(a)(7). If the permit has been denied with prejudice, the developer may then appeal the decision in accordance with the procedures found in 33 C.F.R. §§ 331 et seq.

Note that the EPA has veto authority in accordance with Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act for any Section 404 permits USACE issues. See 40 C.F.R. § 231. This occurs very rarely (approximately 14 times since 1972).

If the final decision is to issue the permit, USACE will forward the permit to the applicant for signature accepting the general and special conditions of the permit. The permit is not valid until signed by the permittee and countersigned by the District Engineer, or designated official. See 33 C.F.R. § 325.2(a)(7). The developer can also appeal the permit if he or she disagrees with any of the terms and conditions.


Add to Project

Contact Information









Edit U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Section 404 Regulatory Contacts 202-761-5903 Visit Website