Browse wiki

From Open Energy Information

DOE-EA-1733
Applicant Calpine +
CompletionNotes Data entry complete 8/13; KERMIT: Need to add Public Health and Safety as a resource  +
EnergyTechnology Geothermal energy  +
EnvironmentalAnalysisType EA +
FundingAgency United States Department of Energy +
GeothermalArea Geysers Geothermal Area +
GeothermalDevelopmentPhases Geothermal/Well Field +
LeadAgency United States Department of Energy +
ManagingDistrictOffice Golden Field Office +
ManagingFieldOffice Golden Field Office +
MineralManager State of California +
NEPA-Name Calpine Enhanced Geothermal Systems Project EA at Geysers Geothermal Area for Geothermal/Well Field  +
NEPA Application Type POU  +
NEPA Completion Notes Data entry complete 8/13; KERMIT: Need to add Public Health and Safety as a resource  +
NEPA Consultant RMT Inc +
NEPA DecisionDocumentDate June 21, 2010  +
NEPA EA EIS Report Media:EA-1733-FEA-2010.pdf +
NEPA FONSI Media:EA-1733-FONSI-2010.pdf +
NEPA LeadAgencyDocNumber DOE-EA-1733  +
NEPA Proposed Action The US Department of Energy (DOE) is prepa
The US Department of Energy (DOE) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) to address the potential environmental effects of the Calpine-Geysers Power Company (Calpine)’s proposed Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) demonstration project. The proposed project would be located within the Northwest Geysers, Sonoma County, California within the Geysers-Clearlake Known Geothermal Resource Area (KGRA). The proposed EGS project includes the injection of water, ranging from 50 to 80 degrees Fahrenheit, into wells to enhance the permeability of an existing high temperature hydrothermal reservoir that would be harnessed to produce electrical energy. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the ability to stimulate high temperature rocks by monitoring their early response to carefully designed injection tests. The project would be a collaborative effort between scientists and engineers of Calpine Corporation, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), and the DOE. The EGS project involves injection of water into existing two wells with modifications. Work would occur in three phases (pre-stimulation, stimulation, and long term injection).
on, stimulation, and long term injection).  +
NEPA Resource Analysis - Present, Potentially Affected Geothermal/Air Quality + , Geothermal/Geology and Minerals + , Geothermal/Induced Seismicity Impact + , Geothermal/Wildlife Resources + , Geothermal/Special Status Species + , Geothermal/Invasive, Nonnative Species + , Geothermal/Cultural Resources + , Geothermal/Noise + , Geothermal/Visual Resources + , Geothermal/Wastes Hazardous or Solid + , Geothermal/Public Health and Safety + , Geothermal/Water Quantity +
NEPA Resource Applicant Mitigation 1. All trucks hauling soils or other dusty
1. All trucks hauling soils or other dusty materials would be covered and two feet of freeboard would be maintained in the trucks 2. Inactive construction areas would be hydroseeded or covered with non-toxic soil stabilizers. “Inactive” areas are previously graded areas that are inactive for 10 days or more. 3. Traffic would be limited to 15 miles per hour on unpaved roads. 4. Dust emissions from venting steam would be reduced by injecting water into the blooie line
ed by injecting water into the blooie line  +
, The pipeline would be designed to accommodate the maximum credible earthquake in the project area so as to reduce potential for adverse effects such as pipeline failure in the event of an earthquake.  + , 1. Calpine would adopt the following measu
1. Calpine would adopt the following measures to minimize noise from the drill rig during re-drilling and testing operations: Shielding of drill rig motor and air compressors: When practicable, set up the drill rig so that it acts as a barrier to shield noise from the motor and compressors from receptors. Buffer metallic surfaces: If needed, cover V-door and drill rig floor with rubber or wood to reduce impact noise from pipes against these metal surfaces. Enclose Rig Floor: If needed, enclose rig floor with metal panels including the V-door opening. Muffle connection equipment: Install mufflers around pipe connection equipment such as air tuggers and winches. Install check valve: Install a check valve in the drill string to slowly bleed off air pressure and reduce high pressure release noise. Bleed air pressure through cyclone muffler: Reduce pressure release noise by bleeding air pressure through the blooie line rather than the rig floor. Pipe Handling: Implement procedures for handling drill pipe that minimize contact with metal surfaces (i.e., on the V-door and catwalk). During air drilling, the rig will be outfitted with a blooie line and cyclonic separator/muffler designed to reduce noise from the release of steam. Similarly, during well testing a portable blooie line and muffler will be utilized to reduce steam release noise. Rig Crew training: Train all rig crews in noise awareness.
g: Train all rig crews in noise awareness.  +
NEPA Resource Comment Expansive soils are common throughout The Geysers; however, the proposed project does not involve work in any previously undisturbed areas or previously undisturbed soils.  + , While non-damaging microseismic activity may increase, the chances of inducing a much larger event are negligible. I  + , Removal of vegetation for well pad prepara
Removal of vegetation for well pad preparation and construction of the SRGRP pipeline may displace a few common small mammals and reptiles; however, the surrounding habitat is plentiful and adequate to support these animals such that they would not be adversely impacted.
that they would not be adversely impacted.  +
, No rare or sensitive plant species are expected to occur at the project site. Special status avian species known to occur in the project area include Sharp-shinned hawk, Common yellowthroat, and Yellow warbler  + , Removal of a small amount of vegetation for construction of the pipeline and re-grading of the well pad would not be considered an adverse effect to the general vegetative communities in the area.  + , The removal of invasive species during construction would be beneficial to the area  + , No work would occur within wetland or riparian habitat  + , The project area is over 4.5 miles away from the nearest 100-year floodplain as defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (FEMA 1996). Adverse impacts are not expected and Floodplains is dismissed as an impact category for analysis.  + , Prehistoric sites in the general project r
Prehistoric sites in the general project region show affinities to prehistoric cultures that lived to the north in Mendocino County, the east in Lake County, and to the south in the San Francisco Bay area. Numerous prehistoric sites have been recorded in the general geographic area in which the project is located.
hic area in which the project is located.  +
, The Geysers are located within the Mayacma
The Geysers are located within the Mayacmas Mountains, which are part of the Inner Coast Ranges of the California Coast Range, in Sonoma and Lake Counties. The predominant visual characteristic of the project region is rugged mountains with elevation ranges up to approximately 5,000 feet (Sonoma County 2008b). The rugged natural landscape is regularly disrupted in the region by power plants, steam collection lines, roads, cut and fill slopes, and other features of the extensive geothermal development
s of the extensive geothermal development  +
, Construction activities include preparation of the well pad and construction of the SRGRP pipeline spur. Some hazardous materials from project-related activities (i.e., fuels, oils) would be present on-site during construction activities.  + , Safety practices and training are required for all workers at the site.  + , The project would not conflict with any of the permitted land uses or require a change in land use within the project area.  + , The project would not result in an increase in vehicular traffic or require a change in traffic circulation.  + , The project would not affect agricultural lands or prime or unique farmland soils as defined by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). The project would not occur on or near any farmlands.  + , here are no national or state Wild and Scenic Rivers within the project area; therefore, impacts are not expected and Wild and Scenic Rivers is dismissed as an impact category for analysis.  + , There are no residents near the project area. The closest residents are located 2 miles from the well pad site.  + , Construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in any major adverse socioeconomic changes.  + , There is no population in the vicinity of the proposed project. The project requires limited construction and drilling activities that are commonplace in the project region.  + , The project would not violate any water quality standards or WDRs. Well bore modifications would not have effects on surface water hydrology. No adverse effects would occur from temporary use of groundwater for drilling water supply.  +
NEPA Resource Imposed Mitigation 1. Devegetated areas would be watered or o
1. Devegetated areas would be watered or other methods would be employed to entrain dust, in order to minimize any adverse impacts from particulate matter emissions during ground disturbance, including asbestiform minerals. 2. Painting of the steam pipelines and supports would conform to NSCAPCD Rule 485 for use of compliant architectural coatings. 3. The Asbestos Air Toxic Control Measure for construction, grading, quarrying and surface mining as approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) would be implemented to avoid adverse effects associated with the emissions of serpentine/asbestiform minerals. 4. All conditions of the ATC and temporary PTO from the NSCAPCD would be implemented. 5. H2S control would be accomplished through the installation of a NSCAPCD approved chemical abatement system 6. Calpine will implement all measures required in the Authority to Construct and Permit to Operate permits issued by the NSCAPCD (included in Appendix D of this EA). 7. Calpine will notify the NSCAPCD 24 hours prior to initiating any planned venting operations until such time that an emissions release protocol governing emissions and notifications for such operations is prepared and provided to the NSCDAPCD
s is prepared and provided to the NSCDAPCD  +
, 1. The SRGRP pipeline spur would be constr
1. The SRGRP pipeline spur would be constructed using Standard Engineering Methods for Expansive Soils, as necessary. 2. Calpine will comply with the DOE’s“Protocol for Induced Seismicity Associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems” (Majer et al. 2008). 3. The stanchions for the SRGRP pipeline will be constructed using Standard Engineering Methods for Expansive soils, as necessary.
Methods for Expansive soils, as necessary.  +
, The well pad would be re-graded and draina
The well pad would be re-graded and drainage containment would be installed to prevent water run-off and erosion of soils. The only structures to be constructed are the stanchions for the SRGRP pipeline spur, which would be constructed using Standard Engineering Methods for Expansive Soils, as necessary. Erosion would be controlled with implementation of a SWPPP and BMPs.
d with implementation of a SWPPP and BMPs.  +
, 1. In order to protect yellow warblers and
1. In order to protect yellow warblers and Common Yellowthroats, any work proposed within riparian woodland habitat between April 1 and August 31 would be surveyed by a qualified biologist. If a nest of either species is discovered within 200 feet of proposed construction activities, construction would be delayed until after August 31 or until a qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged. 2. In order to protect sharp-shinned hawks, any work proposed within riparian woodland series such as white alder or cattails series, between April 1 and August 31 would be surveyed by a qualified biologist. If an active nest is found within 500 feet of proposed construction activities, construction would be delayed until after August 31 or until a qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged. 3. If construction or re-drilling is to occur between April 1 and August 31 preconstruction surveys would be performed in all construction areas and the drilling area within 500 feet of suitable habitat for raptors. If active nests are found, work within these areas would be halted until after August 31 or a qualified biologist has determined the nest is no longer active and the young have fledged. 4. No trees would be removed during construction of the SRGRP pipeline.
during construction of the SRGRP pipeline.  +
, 1. A condition from the Wildhorse Developm
1. A condition from the Wildhorse Development Project has been incorporated into the proposed action to further protect cultural resources. The condition requires placing the following note on all construction plans and providing the language to all contractors and superintendents on the job site: “Should any previously unknown historic or prehistoric resources, including but not limited to charcoal, obsidian or chert flakes, grinding bowls, shell fragments, bone, pockets of dark, friable soils, glass, metal, ceramics, wood or similar debris, be discovered during grading, trenching or other on-site excavation, earthwork in the vicinity of the find shall cease, and the County of Sonoma Permit and Resource Management Department (PRMD) staff shall be notified so that the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist (i.e., an archaeologist registered with the Society of Professional Archaeologists). When contacted, a member of PRMD Project Review staff and the archaeologist shall visit the site to determine the extent of the resources and to develop proper mitigation measures required for the discovery. No earthwork in the vicinity of the find shall commence until a mitigation plan is approved and completed subject to the review and approval of the archaeologist and Project Review staff” 2. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present during pipeline construction along all of West Squaw Creek Road to the tie-in location to ensure that no construction activities occur outside of the existing disturbed road shoulder and to monitor for cultural materials during construction. If a resource is found during construction, the monitor shall have the authority to stop construction until it can be further evaluated. The pipeline would be installed above-ground on stanchions, such that ground disturbance is already minimized to only the stanchion foundations. Any resource found would be avoided by spanning over the resource and/or moving the pipeline to avoid any resource.
moving the pipeline to avoid any resource.  +
, 2. Noise would be controlled in accordance
2. Noise would be controlled in accordance with the standards set in the Noise Element of the Sonoma County General Plan. 3. If noise complaint investigations indicate the appropriate noise standard levels have been or may be exceeded, Calpine would be required to install, at their expense, additional professionally designed noise control measure(s). 4. Well pad, road, and pipeline construction/grading activities would not occur during the nighttime.
ties would not occur during the nighttime.  +
, 1. Pipelines would be painted in earth-ton
1. Pipelines would be painted in earth-tone colors. 2. Rig lights and any other temporary lighting would be shaded and focused downwards to reduce nighttime glare from the well pads during drilling operations. Temporary lighting would only be on for short periods of time, as necessary
on for short periods of time, as necessary  +
, 1. Fire hazards would be minimized through
1. Fire hazards would be minimized through the maintenance of an on-site water supply that can be used to put out any potential fires. Other measures to reduce fire hazards would be implemented and include: *Fire extinguishers and shovels would be available on-site. *All brush build-up around mufflers, radiators, and other engine parts must be avoided; periodic checks must be conducted to prevent this build-up. *Smoking would only be allowed in designated smoking areas; all cigarette butts would be placed in appropriate containers and not thrown on the ground or out windows of vehicles. *Cooking, campfires, or fires of any kind would not be allowed. *Portable generators used in the Project Area would be required to have spark arresters. 2. Existing Calpine health and safety procedures provide plans that address prevention of fires in The Geysers. These plans would be implemented, including: *Fire Prevention Plan (HSP-60) *Hot Work Permit Procedure (No. 145) *The Calpine Geysers Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan 3. Calpine would remove and clear away dry, combustible vegetation from construction sites in the project area that contains substantial forest fire risks and hazards, or are very high fire hazard severity zones as defined by California Division of Forestry and Fire Protection. Grass and other vegetation less than 18 inches in height above the ground may be maintained where necessary to stabilize the soil and prevent erosion. Vehicles would not park in areas where exhaust systems contact combustible materials. Fire extinguishers would be available on the construction site when working in high fire hazard areas to assist in quickly extinguishing any small fires. The Construction Manager would have on site the phone number for the local fire department(s) and would have a phone available when working in high fire hazard areas should additional fire fighting capabilities be required. 4. Calpine would implement the Asbestos Air Toxic Control Measure for construction, grading, quarrying and surface mining as approved by CARB. 5. Workers would wear hearing protection and other personal protection equipment (PPE) as required by the Occupational Health and Safety Organization (OSHA) to prevent injuries. 6. Construction workers would comply with OSHA and CalOSHA asbestos removal worker requirements whenever serpentine rock containing over one percent asbestos is being excavated. 7. Calpine would implement its blowout prevention plan. 8. When cementing jobs are performed, excess cement slurry would be directed to a separate waste tank where it would be chemically retarded for later removal to Calpine’s designated waste management unit.
alpine’s designated waste management unit.  +
, Construction could generate considerable n
Construction could generate considerable noise. Workers would wear hearing protection and other PPE as required by OSHA to prevent injuries. Construction workers would comply with OSHA and CalOSHA asbestos removal worker requirements whenever serpentine rock containing over one percent asbestos is being excavated. Exposure to other hazardous materials and wastes would be minimized through proper handling and training. Adverse effects to human health from construction activities would not occur.
m construction activities would not occur.  +
, 1. Erosion control methods and Best Manage
1. Erosion control methods and Best Management Practices (BMPs) in accordance with a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) would be utilized (such as certified weed-free straw waddle) to reduce erosion or siltation on or off-site during grading of the well pad and construction of the SRGRP pipeline spur. 2. No water would be released to the surface from the pipeline during testing or operation of the pipeline. 3. A SWPPP would be developed and a Notice of Intent submitted to the California State Water Resources Control Board, prior to grading or construction activities. 4. A Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC) would be maintained on-site and implemented to contain incidental drips and/or spills. The plan will identify equipment and procedures used for containment and recovery of accidental spills 5. Contamination during construction along the pipeline corridor would be minimized through containment of any spills before they could be released into stormwater. 6. Containment berms will be constructed around all hazardous material or potentially hazardous material storage for both construction and operation. 7. A drainage system will be installed around the well pad to contain stormwater. 8. BOPE will be installed to minimize blowouts or contamination of the localized shallow aquifer as required by CDOGGR regulations. 9. Calpine will obtain an updated Waste Discharge Order that will address injection of effluent and condensate into the EGS wells. Calpine will submit injection reports to CDOGGR. Injection of water and disposal of waste discharge due to drilling will comply with all requirements outlined in the permit
h all requirements outlined in the permit  +
NEPA Resources Geothermal/Air Quality + , Geothermal/Geology and Minerals + , Geothermal/Soils + , Geothermal/Induced Seismicity Impact + , Geothermal/Wildlife Resources + , Geothermal/Special Status Species + , Geothermal/Vegetation + , Geothermal/Invasive, Nonnative Species + , Geothermal/Wetlands and Riparian Zones + , Geothermal/Floodplains + , Geothermal/Cultural Resources + , Geothermal/Noise + , Geothermal/Visual Resources + , Geothermal/Wastes Hazardous or Solid + , Geothermal/Public Health and Safety + , Geothermal/Lands and Realty + , Geothermal/Access and Transportation + , Geothermal/Prime or Unique Farmlands + , Geothermal/Wild and Scenic Rivers + , Geothermal/Social Values + , Geothermal/Economic Values + , Geothermal/Environmental Justice + , Geothermal/Water Quantity +
NEPA ScopingInitiatedDate December 11, 2009  +
Name DOE-EA-1733  +
OpenEI/PageDescription : NEPA document related to geothermal resource areas   +
OpenEI/PageKeyword Geothermal  + , Geysers Geothermal Area  +
Place California +
ProposedAction The US Department of Energy (DOE) is prepa
The US Department of Energy (DOE) is preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) to address the potential environmental effects of the Calpine-Geysers Power Company (Calpine)’s proposed Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) demonstration project. The proposed project would be located within the Northwest Geysers, Sonoma County, California within the Geysers-Clearlake Known Geothermal Resource Area (KGRA). The proposed EGS project includes the injection of water, ranging from 50 to 80 degrees Fahrenheit, into wells to enhance the permeability of an existing high temperature hydrothermal reservoir that would be harnessed to produce electrical energy. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the ability to stimulate high temperature rocks by monitoring their early response to carefully designed injection tests. The project would be a collaborative effort between scientists and engineers of Calpine Corporation, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), and the DOE. The EGS project involves injection of water into existing two wells with modifications. Work would occur in three phases (pre-stimulation, stimulation, and long term injection).
on, stimulation, and long term injection).  +
Has query
"Has query" is a predefined property that represents meta information (in form of a subobject) about individual queries and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki.
DOE-EA-1733 + , DOE-EA-1733 + , DOE-EA-1733 + , DOE-EA-1733 + , DOE-EA-1733 + , DOE-EA-1733 + , DOE-EA-1733 + , DOE-EA-1733 +
Has processing error
"Has processing error" is a predefined property provided by Semantic MediaWiki and represents errors that appeared in connection with improper value annotations or input processing.
DOE-EA-1733 + , DOE-EA-1733 +
Categories NEPA Doc , Geothermal energy
Modification date
"Modification date" is a predefined property that corresponds to the date of the last modification of a subject and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki.
21:32:41, 22 March 2016  +
Has subobject
"Has subobject" is a predefined property representing a container construct and is provided by Semantic MediaWiki.
DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Air_Quality + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Geology_and_Minerals + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Soils + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Induced_Seismicity_Impact + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Wildlife_Resources + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Special_Status_Species + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Vegetation + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Invasive,_Nonnative_Species + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Wetlands_and_Riparian_Zones + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Floodplains + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Cultural_Resources + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Noise + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Visual_Resources + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Wastes_Hazardous_or_Solid + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Public_Health_and_Safety + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Lands_and_Realty + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Access_and_Transportation + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Prime_or_Unique_Farmlands + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Wild_and_Scenic_Rivers + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Social_Values + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Economic_Values + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Environmental_Justice + , DOE-EA-1733#NEPAImpact_with_Water_Quantity +
hide properties that link here 
  No properties link to this page.
 
Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.