U
860

Property:NEPA Resource Comment

From Open Energy Information

Property Name NEPA Resource Comment
Property Type Text
Description Comment on the analysis of a potential impact to a NEPA resource

Pages using the property "NEPA Resource Comment"

Showing 25 pages using this property.

View (previous 25 | next 25) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

B
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Floodplains +The proposed project is not located in any FEMA-designated floodplains.  +
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Social_Values +No social values would be affected by the project.  +
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Fisheries_Resources +The proposed project is not located in or near any fisheries.  +
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Wild_and_Scenic_Rivers +The proposed project is not located in or near any wild and scenic rivers (BLM WFO 2002).  +
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Prime_or_Unique_Farmlands +The proposed project is not located in or near any prime or unique farmlands (BLM WFO 2002).  +
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Wilderness +The proposed project is not in or adjacent to any wilderness area (BLM WFO 2002).  +
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Environmental_Justice +There are no environmental justice issues associated with the project (BLM WFO 2002).  +
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Wetlands_and_Riparian_Zones +There is no riparian habitat within the geothermal operations area or along the transmission line corridor (Covert 2007)  +
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01 +The proposed project is not located in or near any ACECs (BLM WFO 2002).  +, There are no environmental justice issues associated with the project (BLM WFO 2002).  +, The proposed project is not located in any FEMA-designated floodplains.  +,
BLM-NV-WN-ES-08-01-1310, NV-020-08-01#NEPAImpact_with_Areas_of_Critical_Environmental_Concern +The proposed project is not located in or near any ACECs (BLM WFO 2002).  +
Boardman to Hemingway +Native American Reservations are not crossed, however, there are 45 tribes within 2 miles of the proposed project's pathway.  +, Native American Reservations are not crossed, however, there are 45 tribes within 2 miles of the proposed project's pathway. Burial sites, cultural practices, and artifacts commonly occur off of the indian reservation.  +, "Buzzing" disturbances may interfere with "wildness" feeling. The noise generated from this project will not exceed allowable decibels.  +,
Boardman to Hemingway#NEPAImpact_with_Environmental_Justice +Native American Reservations are not crossed, however, there are 45 tribes within 2 miles of the proposed project's pathway.  +
Boardman to Hemingway#NEPAImpact_with_Noise +"Buzzing" disturbances may interfere with "wildness" feeling. The noise generated from this project will not exceed allowable decibels.  +
Boardman to Hemingway#NEPAImpact_with_Native_American_Concerns +Native American Reservations are not crossed, however, there are 45 tribes within 2 miles of the proposed project's pathway. Burial sites, cultural practices, and artifacts commonly occur off of the indian reservation.  +
Boardman to Hemingway#NEPAImpact_with_Threatened_and_Endangered_Species +The Sage Grouse habitat will be heavily disturbed.  +
C
CA-96062042 +Mitigation was included despite the EIS saying there would be no adverse effects on grazing.  +
CA-96062042#NEPAImpact_with_Range_Resources +Mitigation was included despite the EIS saying there would be no adverse effects on grazing.  +
D
DOE-EA-1116#NEPAImpact_with_Social_Values +As demonstrated by the statistical data provided in Section 3.1.1, the Reno/Sparks MSA is not predominantly comprised of minority or disadvantaged groups.  +
DOE-EA-1116 +As demonstrated by the statistical data provided in Section 3.1.1, the Reno/Sparks MSA is not predominantly comprised of minority or disadvantaged groups.  +, The estimated peak work force during construction is estimated to be 75 to 100 workers. Preference would be given to local companies. Therefore, the project is not expected to generate a major influx of new employees.  +, Implementation of the proposed action would be consistent with the existing Washoe County land use plan which designates the use of the project site for geothermal development.  +,
DOE-EA-1116#NEPAImpact_with_Public_Health_and_Safety +Potential impacts to public health and safety associated with the proposed action would be limited to upset conditions resulting from accidental releases from on-site ammonia storage tanks and transferring geothermal brine at the power plant.  +
DOE-EA-1116#NEPAImpact_with_Cultural_Resources +Although the Sinter Quarry occupies roughly two-thirds of the project area, the distinct loci being recommended for eligibility on the NRHP consist of debris that is scattered widely throughout the individual sites.  +
DOE-EA-1116#NEPAImpact_with_Soils +Approximately 3.4 ha (8.4 acres) would be cleared and graded during site preparation.  +
DOE-EA-1116#NEPAImpact_with_Vegetation +Permanent impacts to vegetation in the study area would consist mainly of loss of upland open forest and, to a lesser extent, sagebrush from construction of the proposed action.  +
DOE-EA-1116#NEPAImpact_with_Economic_Values +The estimated peak work force during construction is estimated to be 75 to 100 workers. Preference would be given to local companies. Therefore, the project is not expected to generate a major influx of new employees.  +
DOE-EA-1116#NEPAImpact_with_Geology_and_Minerals +Approximately 3.4 ha (8.4 acres) would be cleared and graded during site preparation. These impacts are not expected to effect the on-site geology (i.e., change geologic substructures).  +