Difference between revisions of "Solar+Storage/Impact of Technology Cost"

From Open Energy Information
(add cost3)
(change bottom nav next link)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
<div class="pageNav pageNav-prev">[[Solar+Storage/About this Project|About]]
 
<div class="pageNav pageNav-prev">[[Solar+Storage/About this Project|About]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
<div class="pageNav pageNav-next">[[Solar+Storage/Location of Emerging S+S Markets|Location of Emerging S+S Markets]]
+
<div class="pageNav pageNav-next">[[Solar+Storage/Impact of Utility Rate Design|Impact of Utility Rate Design]]</div>
</div>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
{{Solar+Storage-Footer}}
 
{{Solar+Storage-Footer}}

Revision as of 12:00, 27 October 2017

Menu

Impact of Technology Costs on Solar+Storage Economics

Key Questions

  • At what price points does solar+storage become economical?

Results

  • As lithium-ion battery system prices decline, the number of locations and building types in which batteries are economical increases significantly.
  • Even at higher technology costs, solar with storage systems are economical in some building types in Anaheim, San Francisco and New York.
  • Office buildings, hospitals, large hotels, and secondary schools may see cost savings from solar with storage in the near term.
  • All of the 16 building types modeled see cost savings from solar with storage, in more than one location, under the lowest cost point.
  • At lower technology cost points, solar with storage is economical in 10 of the 16 locations modeled.

Cost Point Definitions

File:CostAssumption-Static.png

Contacts


Joyce Mclaren (bio)
Senior Energy Analyst
National Renewable Energy Laboratory

303-384-7362
Todd Olinsky-Paul
Project Director
Clean Energy Group

802-223-2554