You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
Section number derived automatically from the wiki page. Move the page to change the section number.
Select the flowchart which accompanies this section.
Please check the technology the roadmap section applies to.
Select the hydropower project type
Information current as of
The year this permitting roadmap section was updated to current information.
Preliminary site selection for potential development of power generating facilities focuses on a number of different factors, including the location of the land, any potential environmental impacts, water access and water rights issues, and the accessibility to transmission lines. If the land being considered is managed by a federal agency there may be certain restrictions limiting what the land can be used for. The developer should consider what agency or governmental body will oversee the permitting process as requirements can vary.
Overview of the permit or section being discussed.
==2.1 - Consider Project Location==
Statutory or regulatory limitations require that certain lands be excluded from consideration for development. These lands generally include U.S. National Monuments, federally designated Wilderness Areas, and U.S. Forest Service primitive areas. Prior to substantial investments, a developer should research whether a proposed site or area is available for development. [[Federal Energy Regulatory Commission|Federal Energy Regulatory Commission]] (FERC),[[Bureau of Reclamation|Bureau of Reclamation]] (BOR), [[United States Forest Service|U.S. Forest Service]] (USFS), [[Fish and Wildlife Service]] (FWS), and [[Bureau of Land Management]] (BLM) provide guidance on federal exclusions and site specific stipulations to protect environmental resources.
Development may be restricted on a site for a variety of reasons, including:
* National park, monument, lakeshore, parkway, battlefield, or recreational area;
* National wildlife refuge, game preserve, fish hatchery;
* Wild and Scenic Rivers;
* Wilderness area or wilderness study area;
* Indian or Military reservation;
* Cultural and historic value;
* Recreational, geologic, wildlife, or scenic value;
* Fish presence value;
* Threatened and endangered species;
* Impacts to Military operations;
* Land and Water Conservation Fund areas; or
* Urban Park and Recreation Recovery lands.
Under [[Executive Order 11988 - Floodplain Management | Executive Order 11988]], each federal agency is required to take action to reduce the risk of flood loss, to minimize the impact of floods on human safety, health and welfare, and to restore and preserve the values of floodplains. If a proposed project is located within a floodplain, then federal agencies are required to take specific actions during environmental review under the [[National Environmental Policy Act]] (NEPA). For example, the federal agency will be required to consider alternatives to avoid adverse effects and incompatible development in floodplains areas.
Each BLM and Forest Service field office has a Land Use Management Plan outlining site-specific exclusion information and stipulations for mitigation of environmental concerns. Visit the [[BLM]] or [[USFS]] for links to local offices.
'''Resources to Determine Land Use Limitations'''
The Western Renewable Energy Zones initiative addresses exclusions of potentially available areas in its Phase 1 Report, which you can find on the [[Western Governors' Association]] Energy Website.
The [[Western Governors' Association]] has developed the [[Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool | Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool]] (CHAT) which allows developers to access an online system of maps displaying crucial wildlife habitat and corridors across the western United States. The developer will be able to make an initial determination as to whether the proposed project will interfere with a wildlife area. CHAT is designed to reduce conflicts during the development process and ensure the protection of wildlife through incorporating such considerations in the land use decision-making process.
The [[Natural Resources Defense Council]] (NRDC) in conjunction with the [[United States Department of Defense]] has developed the [[Renewable Energy and Defense Geospatial Database | Renewable Energy and Defense Geospatial Database]] (READ-Database) to provide Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data to assist developers in choosing an appropriate site for their renewable energy project. The READ-Database highlights possible project locations which are unlikely to interfere with military activities, and have the fewest environmental conflicts. To access the READ-Database, developers must submit a request to the NRDC on their website.
The BLM’s Solar Energy Program amended eighty-nine BLM land use plans in six states under the [[Solar PEIS]]. The study identified Solar Energy Zones (SEZ) within the six states that are well suited for utility-scale solar development. The Solar PEIS facilitates utility-scale solar development and streamlines environmental compliance in SEZ’s. For more information, see:
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/3-FD-c (1)|BLM Right-of-Way Application Process Overview: <br>3-FD-c (1)]]</span>
==2.2 - Consider Land Access==
Dependent upon land ownership of the proposed development site, the process for obtaining land access and/or a lease will vary. Reviewing the potential lease process can prevent surprises. Many federal agencies have varying requirements for siting projects on land which they manage. For example, if a project is located near a national park and could impact or impair [[National Park Service]] (NPS) resources, then the developer is required to coordinate with NPS to determine whether the impact would harm the integrity of park resources or values. The developer should consider any federal agencies or land that may be impacted by the proposed project to determine whether any further siting restrictions may be applicable.
In order for a developer to construct a solar energy facility on a proposed site, the developer must have an interest in the surface rights of the land. If the proposed site is on federal land, the developer must apply to the surface management agency for access to the surface rights. There are a number of different ways for the developer to negotiate the surface rights, but depending on the agency, access to the land is typically granted through long-term leases, rights-of-way, or special use authorizations.
Although utility-scale solar facilities only require the developer to obtain surface rights to the land being used for development, consideration should also be given to subsurface mineral rights as well. Because solar projects have the potential to cover large areas of land, there may be other developers conducting exploration or development beneath the surface for oil, gas, or other subsurface minerals. To avoid potential interruption, solar developers should inquire about both the surface and subsurface land rights associated with the potential development site. [[43 CFR 2801]].
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/3 (1)|Land Access Process Overview: 3]]</span>
==2.3 – Consider Water Access and Water Rights==
Water access and water rights are predominantly governed by state law. Although water requirements are a primary site consideration for all renewable energy project developers, the requirements will differ greatly depending on the type of project.
For solar projects, a developer may require access to water for such uses as dust suppression for roads, construction activities, and maintenance. In addition, access to water is necessary for concentrated solar power facilities.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/19|Water Access & Water Rights Overview: 19]]</span>
==2.4 - Review Applicable State and Local Law on Development Requirements==
When considering a site for development, it may be useful to review some of the permits that will be required where the project is located. Reviewing the questions that will be considered during On-Site Evaluations will be useful in identifying potential issues with a particular location.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/6|Construction Permits Overview: 6]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/10 (1)|On-Site Evaluation Process: 10]]</span>
==2.5 - Consider Environmental Process==
The [[National Environmental Policy Act]] (NEPA) of 1970 requires Federal agencies to consider the potential environmental consequences of their proposed action, and any reasonable alternatives, before deciding whether and in what form to take an action.
The NEPA process is often the most time consuming process in permitting a project site. It is often required for multiple phases of the project, so it is a good idea to list the phases early on in project development so that multiple phases may be addressed in one EA/EIS.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/9 (1)|Environmental Overview: 9]]</span>
==2.6 - Consider Transmission Siting and Interconnection Overview==
The proximity to existing transmission and access to potential rights-of-way is key to a successful project.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/8|Transmission Overview: 8]]</span>
==2.7 - Contact Lead Agency==
An important early step in project development is determining which agency (or agencies) is most central to the project. A lead agency is the public agency that has the principal responsibility for approving a project. Lead agency determination is affected by surface management (Federal, tribal, state, or private) or land/mineral rights ownership. In some jurisdictions there is a single agency officially designated as the lead agency for the entire project. In other circumstances, there is no single, dominant agency, while in others an agency may only be the lead on certain matters (e.g. environmental issues) or project phases.
The permitting process differs depending on the lead agency, so scheduling a meeting early in the development process is important. This meeting should precede any filings of applications and permits, since requirements obtained in a pre-filing meeting will heavily set the overall direction and timing of the project. The lead agency will often work directly with other coordinating or participating agencies; when this occurs developers are not allowed to interact with a coordinating agency directly. It may take one to two years between a pre-filing meeting with the lead agency and formally submitting permitting documents to that agency.
Paragraphs supporting the elements in the flowchart. Delineate section headers with "==" wiki text.
Enter agency or multiple agencies, separated by semi-colons.
[[Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool | Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool]];[[Renewable Energy and Defense Geospatial Database | Renewable Energy and Defense Geospatial Database]];
Enter multiple References, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
[[National Environmental Policy Act]];[[Executive Order 11988 - Floodplain Management | Executive Order 11988]]
Enter multiple Regulations, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
Please provide the contact position or title. Use the drop down selection to find the appropriate contact.Options are listed in the format of: Organization: Position
Assemble a trigger using the fields below. Multiple triggers are treated as "OR" conditionals.
Surface ManagerSurface OwnerMineral ManagerMineral OwnerActivityEncroachmentEnvironmentalLocationLand Use PlanGeothermal LeaseHazardous WasteImpactsFacilityFundingManagedPlannedPower PlantTransmissionTransportation
DrillingExplorationGeophysicsLeasingPower Plant DevelopmentWell Abandonment
can be described as
CogenerationSmall Power ProductionIndependent Power ProductionWholesale CustomerFERC ExemptedFERC LicensedUnderground StorageAbove-Ground StorageTemporary Water RequirementPermanent Water RequirementDrinking Water Providing
ActiveNoApplicant Is Lessee
Capacity Exceeds 20 MWCapacity Under 20 MWCapacity Is 50 MWCapacity Exceeds 50 MWCapacity Under 100 MWPUC Certification
Historic PropertiesNative American Historic PropertyNative Hawaiian Historic PropertyNational Register Historic PropertyHistoric Property (Alteration)AirportMigratory BirdsBald Or Golden EagleMarine Mammals Or HabitatFederal Endangered SpeciesFarmland Or LivestockMilitary LandWaters Of The USNavigable WatersWild Or Scenic RiverWetlands By Dregging Or FillingGroundwater By DischargeStorm WaterWater Discharge To WellWater Discharge To LandWater Point Source DischargeWaste Water Associated With Only GeothermalReceived State 401 WQ CertHas Not Received 401 WQ CertAir QualityAir Quality From ConstructionAir Quality From OperationSolid Waste
Line Capacity Under 200 kVLine Capacity Exceeds 50 kVWithin NIETCCAISO GridExempt Per GO 131 D III B 1Not Exempt From CEQAPUC CertificationProject Under GO 131 D II B 2
Assessment CompletedImpact SignificantImpact Likely SignificantAnalysis Impacts AdverseAnalysis Impacts Not AdverseNo Best Interests FindingNo Categorical ExclusionNo Determination Of NEPA AdequacyPrior State AnalysisNo Prior State AnalysisProcess Not Complete For DrillingExtraordinary Circumstances
Interconnection AgreementPre-Application Process
State Highway ROW
Exceeds Max Length Or Load
Please note that all contributions to Open Energy Information are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Zero (see Creative Commons).
When contributing, you must abide with Open Energy Information's core content policies of neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research.
This is a minor edit
Watch this page
| Editing help