You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
Section number derived automatically from the wiki page. Move the page to change the section number.
Select the flowchart which accompanies this section.
Please check the technology the roadmap section applies to.
Select the hydropower project type
Information current as of
The year this permitting roadmap section was updated to current information.
A bulk transmission developer must consider the pre-existing land uses of the proposed project site. Pre-existing land uses at and surrounding the site are critical considerations in the early planning stages of the project. Federal and state law may prohibit interference with certain pre-existing land uses. Bulk transmission developers should consider project impacts on farmland, livestock, nearby airports, military lands, navigable waters, and whether the project will raise any state land issues.
Overview of the permit or section being discussed.
==13.1 – Review Project Location==
The developer must review the project location to determine if there are pre-existing uses of the land that may be impacted as a result of the project.
==13.2 to 13.3 – Will the Project Affect Farmland or Livestock?==
The developer should consider whether the project would impact farmland or livestock. The [[United States Department of Agriculture]] and other federal agencies are tasked with ensuring that the actions of the federal government do not cause U.S. farmland to be irreversibly converted to non-agricultural uses. The [[Farmland Protection Policy Act]] (FPPA) protects agriculturally productive lands from conversion to other land uses, and it could impede a developer's ability to continue with a project. Impacts on farmland or livestock can occur through displacing agriculturally productive lands or through emissions that impact the productivity of agricultural lands.
The FPPA requires federal agencies carrying out federal programs to identify and take into account any adverse effects on farmland created by those programs. If the federal project will irreversibly convert farmland to a non-agricultural use, the developer should consider mitigation efforts and alternative project sites. For more information, see:
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/13-FD-a|Farmland Evaluation: <br>13-FD-a]]</span>
==13.4 to 13.5 – Will the Project Be On or Adjacent to Military Lands?==
The developer should consider whether the project will be located on or adjacent to military lands or installations. The [[Sikes Act]] authorizes the [[United States Department of Defense]] (DOD) to carry out a program for the conservation and rehabilitation of natural resources on military installations. The developer should consult the Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan (INRMP) if the proposed project will be on military land.
In addition, the military engages local governments and landowners for areas adjacent to military based to develop land use restrictions suitable to the purposes of the military installation. For projects, adjacent to military land, the developer should consult the relevant DOD Joint Land Use Study, local land use plans, and private land use agreements. For more information, see:
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/13-FD-b|Military Land Evaluation: <br>13-FD-b]]</span>
==13.6 to 13.7 – Will the Project Require the Construction of a Bridge Over Navigable Waters?==
The developer should consider whether the project would require the construction of a bridge over navigable waters. Federal law protects navigable waters from any construction that could potentially impede the navigability of the channel. Construction or modification of a bridge across a navigable waterway of the United States requires a Bridge Permit from the [[United States Coast Guard]] (USCG). The USCG’s bridge permitting authority can be found in [[Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 USC 401)]], [[The Bridge Act of 1906 (33 U.S.C. 491 - 498)]], and [[The General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 - 533)]]. Today, [[The General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 - 533) | the General Bridge Act of 1946]] is cited as the authority for Bridge Permits in most cases. For more information, see:
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/13-FD-c| Bridge Permit: <br>13-FD-c]]</span>
==13.8 to 13.9 – Will the Project Have a Substantial Aeronautical Impact?==
The developer must consider any impact the project may have to nearby airports. Developers should consult with local airports to determine whether the project will have any direct or indirect effects on nearby flyways.
Generally, construction or alteration projects that include objects 200 feet above ground level (or higher) require developers to submit notice of the project to the [[Federal Aviation Administration]] (FAA). The FAA will evaluate the project based on obstruction standards and other factors in order to determine whether the construction or alteration will have a substantial aeronautical impact. Even where the FAA determines that there is no hazard to air navigation, they may include conditional provisions, limitations necessary to minimize potential problems, lighting/marking recommendations, and/or supplemental notice requirements.
For a full description of the relevant considerations and applicable processes, see
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/13-FD-d|Aeronatucial Considerations: <br>13-FD-d]]</span>
==13.10 to 13.11 – Will the Project Obstruct or Alter Navigable Waters of the U.S.?==
The developer should consider whether the proposed project will obstruct or alter navigable waters of the U.S. Section 10 of the [[Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403) | Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899]] requires a developer to obtain a permit from the [[U S Army Corps of Engineers | U.S. Army Corps of Engineers]] for any project that obstructs or alters any navigable water of the United States, including any work or structures in, over, or under or affecting the course, location, or condition of navigable waters. Navigable waters of the United States are “those waters that are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide and/or are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.” For more information, see:
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/13-FD-e|Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 Permit: <br>13-FD-e]]</span>
==13.12 to 13.13 – Will the Project Impact State Coastal Lands?==
A developer may need coastal zone approval for projects that have the potential to impact state coastal zones from states that have programs that comply with the federal Coastal Zone Management Program.
The federal Coastal Zone Management Program established by the [[Coastal Zone Management Act]] (CZMA) of 1972 is a voluntary state-federal partnership, which encourages states to adopt their own management programs in order to meet the federal goals of protection, restoration, and appropriate development of coastal zone resources. [[15 C.F.R. §§ 930 et seq., Federal Consistency with Approved Coastal Management Programs|15 CFR Part 930, Subpart D]]; [[Coastal Zone Management Act|16 U.S.C. § 1456(c)(3)(A)]]. The CZMA applies to projects located within the state’s coastal areas and to projects located outside of the state’s coastal areas that are reasonably likely to affect the state’s coastal resources or coastal land and water uses. See [[15 CFR § 930|15 CFR § 930.11]]. The CZMA defines “coastal zone” as “the coastal waters (including the lands therein and thereunder) and the adjacent shorelands (including the waters therein and thereunder), strongly influenced by each other and in proximity to the shorelines of the several coastal states, and includes islands, transitional and intertidal areas, salt marshes, wetlands, and beaches. The zone extends, in Great Lakes waters, to the international boundary between the United States and Canada and, in other areas, seaward to the outer limit of State title and ownership[.]” [[Coastal Zone Management Act|16 U.S.C. § 1453(1)]].
A state may also require additional state coastal land approvals.
<div class="state-block" data-abbr="LA">
In Louisiana, a bulk transmission developer may need a Coastal Use Permit from the [[Louisiana Department of Natural Resources]] or appropriate local authority before beginning construction of a project that falls within a coastal zone [[Louisiana Department of Natural Resources – Coastal Use Permit Webpage]]. For more information, see:
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/13-LA-b|Coastal Use Permit: <br>13-LA-b]]</span>
<div class="state-block" data-abbr="">
Currently, the RAPID Toolkit does not have state specific content regarding coastal land protections for bulk transmission development in any other state.
==13.14 to 13.15 – Will the Project Impact State Wetlands?==
A developer may need to obtain approval from the state for projects that impact freshwater, tidal, or other wetlands in the state.
Currently, the RAPID Toolkit does not have state specific content regarding wetland protections for bulk transmission development.
==13.16 to 13.18 – Will the Project Impact Raise Any Additional Pre-existing State Land Use Issues?==
The developer should consider additional pre-existing stat land use issues. A state may require additional state land use approvals regarding a number of pre-existing land features. For example, a state may require approval for projects that may impact state floodplains, dunes, conservation districts, shorelines, and river corridors.
Currently, the RAPID Toolkit does not have state specific content regarding pre-existing land use approvals for bulk transmission development.
Paragraphs supporting the elements in the flowchart. Delineate section headers with "==" wiki text.
Enter agency or multiple agencies, separated by semi-colons.
Enter multiple References, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
[[Farmland Protection Policy Act]]; [[Sikes Act]]; [[Rivers and Harbors Act]]; [[The Bridge Act of 1906 (33 U.S.C. 491 - 498)]]; [[The General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 - 533)]]; [[Coastal Zone Management Act]]; [[15 C.F.R. §§ 930 et seq., Federal Consistency with Approved Coastal Management Programs]];
Enter multiple Regulations, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
Please provide the contact position or title. Use the drop down selection to find the appropriate contact.Options are listed in the format of: Organization: Position
Assemble a trigger using the fields below. Multiple triggers are treated as "OR" conditionals.
Surface ManagerSurface OwnerMineral ManagerMineral OwnerActivityEncroachmentEnvironmentalLocationLand Use PlanGeothermal LeaseHazardous WasteImpactsFacilityFundingManagedPlannedPower PlantTransmissionTransportation
DrillingExplorationGeophysicsLeasingPower Plant DevelopmentWell Abandonment
can be described as
CogenerationSmall Power ProductionIndependent Power ProductionWholesale CustomerFERC ExemptedFERC LicensedUnderground StorageAbove-Ground StorageTemporary Water RequirementPermanent Water RequirementDrinking Water Providing
ActiveNoApplicant Is Lessee
Capacity Exceeds 20 MWCapacity Under 20 MWCapacity Is 50 MWCapacity Exceeds 50 MWCapacity Under 100 MWPUC Certification
Historic PropertiesNative American Historic PropertyNative Hawaiian Historic PropertyNational Register Historic PropertyHistoric Property (Alteration)AirportMigratory BirdsBald Or Golden EagleMarine Mammals Or HabitatFederal Endangered SpeciesFarmland Or LivestockMilitary LandWaters Of The USNavigable WatersWild Or Scenic RiverWetlands By Dregging Or FillingGroundwater By DischargeStorm WaterWater Discharge To WellWater Discharge To LandWater Point Source DischargeWaste Water Associated With Only GeothermalReceived State 401 WQ CertHas Not Received 401 WQ CertAir QualityAir Quality From ConstructionAir Quality From OperationSolid Waste
Line Capacity Under 200 kVLine Capacity Exceeds 50 kVWithin NIETCCAISO GridExempt Per GO 131 D III B 1Not Exempt From CEQAPUC CertificationProject Under GO 131 D II B 2
Assessment CompletedImpact SignificantImpact Likely SignificantAnalysis Impacts AdverseAnalysis Impacts Not AdverseNo Best Interests FindingNo Categorical ExclusionNo Determination Of NEPA AdequacyPrior State AnalysisNo Prior State AnalysisProcess Not Complete For DrillingExtraordinary Circumstances
Interconnection AgreementPre-Application Process
State Highway ROW
Exceeds Max Length Or Load
Please note that all contributions to Open Energy Information are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Zero (see Creative Commons).
When contributing, you must abide with Open Energy Information's core content policies of neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research.
This is a minor edit
Watch this page
| Editing help