You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
Section number derived automatically from the wiki page. Move the page to change the section number.
Select the flowchart which accompanies this section.
Please check the technology the roadmap section applies to.
Select the hydropower project type
Information current as of
The year this permitting roadmap section was updated to current information.
Federal and state laws protect certain biological resources from particular impacts. Each project will be required to assess the impacts it may have on protected flora and fauna as well as impacts on their habitat. State level protections may be even more stringent - protecting more species and habitat - than federal laws. It is critical to consult with area experts early in order to determine whether a conflict with species can be avoided by choosing an alternative site for development. It may also be helpful to determine a time of year for development that does not conflict with wildlife. Early consultation is the primary method of determining the most advantageous site and time for development in order to avoid issues with protected species and avoid delay in processing environmental analysis.
Typically developers consider migratory birds, bald and golden eagle habitat, protected marine mammals and endangered and threatened species. The [[FWS - Candidate Species List under the Endangered Species Act | candidate species]] category is also an emerging area of concern. The greater sage-grouse (a candidate species) in particular has caused delays in development and in some cases foreclosed particular areas for energy development. See [[Greater Sage-Grouse Populations and Energy Development in Wyoming | Greater Sage-Grouse Populations and Energy Development in Wyoming]] article and the BLM [[BLM - Sage-Grouse and Sagebrush Conservation webpage | webpage]] on sage-grouse.
Overview of the permit or section being discussed.
==12.1 Conduct Preliminary Screening To Identify Potentially Affected Biological Resources==
Developers should use some mechanism to conduct a preliminary screening that identifies biological resources that may be affected by the project. For example, the Western Governors' Association (WGA website) has a Crucial Habitat Screening Tool (CHAT), available at the [[Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool | CHAT website]]. While not mandatory, this step can help identify major biological issues at the outset that could critically affect the project. In addition, conducting a preliminary screening can support a finding that subsequent biological surveys are unnecessary, although the [[Fish and Wildlife Service]] (FWS) must concur.
==12.2 - Conduct Biological Surveys as Needed To Identify Potentially Affected Biological Resources==
By regulation, a biological assessment is prepared for "major construction activities"
considered to be federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
as referred to in the [[National Environmental Policy Act]] of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.). A major construction activity is a construction project or other undertaking having
similar physical impacts, which qualify under NEPA as a major federal action. Major
construction activities include dams, buildings, pipelines, roads, water resource developments,
channel improvements, and other such projects that modify the physical environment and that
constitute major federal actions. As a rule of thumb, if an Environmental Impact Statement is
required for the proposed action and construction-type impacts are involved, it is considered a
major construction activity.
A biological assessment is required if listed species or critical habitat may be present in the
action area. It is optional if only proposed species or proposed critical habitat is involved.
However, if both proposed and listed species are present, a biological assessment is required
and must address both proposed and listed species. An assessment may be recommended
for other activities to ensure the agency's early involvement and increase the chances for
resolution during informal consultation.
([[Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Handbook |Section 7 Consultation Handbook]])
==12.3 - Confirm Survey Protocol; Supply Species List==
The [[Fish and Wildlife Service]] must confirm the survey protocol, and supply a species list to the developer.
==12.4 to 12.5 - Is There Potential for the Activity To Take Migratory Birds or Eggs?==
The developer should consult with the FWS to determine the presence of migratory birds and habitats that could potentially be impacted by the proposed activities for birds of conservation concern.
A list of bird "Species of Concern" identified by the US FWLS Migratory Bird Program Strategic Plan 2004-2012 can be found as an attachment to BLM's [[BLM - Western BLM Bird Species of Conservation Concern List | Instruction Memorandum]].
In addition, although not currently mandated by law – the FWS is also using a similar assessment and permit process where the project may result in the taking of bats. Thus, developers with projects in areas that may result in the taking of bats are encouraged to consult with the FWS.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-a|Migratory Bird Considerations: <br>12-FD-a]]</span>
==12.6 to 12.7 - Are There Any Bald or Golden Eagle Activities Present at the Project Location?==
If the proposed project location contains a nesting or wintering bald or golden eagle, then the developer will be required to obtain a Bald & Gold Eagle Permit. In addition, any evidence of bald or golden eagle activities at the project location will likely require a Bald and Golden Eagle Permit.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-b|Bald & Golden Eagle Permit: <br>12-FD-b]]</span>
==12.8 to 12.9 – Is There Potential for the Activity To Impact Essential Fish Habitat (EFH)?==
Where the project could impact fisheries identified as Essential Fish Habitat, pursuant to the [[Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act]], the authorizing agency is required to submit an Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Assessment to [[National Marine Fisheries Service|NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service]].
==12.10 to 12.13 - Is There Potential To Impact Marine Mammals or Their Habitats?==
The [[Marine Mammal Protection Act]] (MMPA) placed a moratorium on the taking of marine mammals, with limited exceptions. [[The Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 | Section 101(a)(5)(A)]] of the MMPA authorizes the [[National Marine Fisheries Service]] (NMFS) or the FWS, depending on the type of marine mammal affected, to issue permits for the "incidental, but not intentional, taking by citizens while engaging in that activity within that region of small numbers of marine mammals of a species or population stock..." Permits may be issued if the appropriate agency finds that the total expected takings during a specific activity (other than commercial fishing) will have a negligible impact on the species and will not have an unmitigatable adverse impact on the availability of these species for subsistence use by Alaska Natives.
The FWS has jurisdiction over species such as manatees, sea otters, polar bears, and Pacific walruses. The NMFS has jurisdiction over most other marine mammal species, including pinnipeds other than those under the jurisdiction of the FWS (seals, sea lions), and all cetaceans (porpoises, dolphins, and whales).
The developer should contact the appropriate FWS or NMFS office to discuss conclusions and obtain guidance in preparation of a request for incidental take authorization. Requests for incidental take authorization for marine mammals under the jurisdiction of the USFWS are handled in the appropriate Field Offices in coordination with the Regional Office. For marine mammal species under the jurisdiction of NMFS, the request is handled through Headquarters in Silver Spring, MD.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-c|National Marine and Fisheries Service- Marine Mammal Protection Act Incidental Harassment Authorization Process: <br>12-FD-c]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-h|Fish and Wildlife Service- Marine Mammal Protection Act Incidental Harassment Authorization Process: <br>12-FD-h]]</span>
==12.14 to 12.15 – Are There Federal Listed Species or Critical Habitats?==
Under the [[Endangered Species Act]], the term ‘‘endangered species’’ means any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range other than a species of the Class Insecta determined by the Secretary to constitute a pest whose protection under the provisions of this Act would present an overwhelming and overriding risk to man.
Under the [[Endangered Species Act]], federal agencies are required to conduct a Biological Assessment to ensure that any actions they undertake do not jeopardize the existence of any listed species. If a listed species or critical habitat is likely to be affected, the agency must provide the [[Fish and Wildlife Service]] with an evaluation on the likely effects of the action.
==12.16 - ESA Section 7 Consultation==
If there is a federal nexus, then the developer will be required to undergo a Section 7 Consultation. Any federal nexus (federal involvement) is sufficient to federalize a proposed action. Examples of actions with a federal nexus are as follows:
*Actions on federal land;
*Actions that require a federal permit (such as a wetland permit);
*Actions that require a federal license; and
*Actions using federal funds.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-f|ESA Section 7 Consultation: <br>12-FD-f]]</span>
==12.17 - ESA Section 10 Take Permit ==
If there is not a federal nexus, then the developer will be required to obtain a Section 10 Take Permit.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-d|ESA Section 10 Take Permit: <br>12-FD-d]]</span>
==12.18 – Consult Lead Agency To Determine if There Are Other Biological Concerns==
Even where there is seemingly no potential for the project to affect migratory birds, bald or golden eagles, marine mammals, federally listed species or critical habitats, developers should consult with the lead agency, either FWS or NMFS, to ensure that the project does not pose a threat to any other biological resources as mandated by law or regulation.
==12.19 - State Biological Resource Assessment Process==
State-level restrictions on biological resources can be more stringent than the federal rules. Thus, developers must consult applicable state rules for biological resource considerations.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-AK-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-AK-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-CA-a|California Fish and Game Process: <br>12-CA-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-CO-a|State Fish and Wildlife License Conditions and Recommendations: <br>12-CO-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-HI-a|Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take License: <br>12-HI-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-ID-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-ID-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-MT-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-MT-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-NM-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-NM-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-NV-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-NV-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-OR-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-OR-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-TX-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-TX-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-UT-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-UT-a]]</span>
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-WA-a|Live Wildlife Taking Permit: <br>12-WA-a]]</span>
Paragraphs supporting the elements in the flowchart. Delineate section headers with "==" wiki text.
Enter agency or multiple agencies, separated by semi-colons.
[[ESA Forms | ESA Form 3-200-56]]; [[ESA Forms | Eagles Form 3-200-16]]; [[ESA Forms | Marine Mammals Form 3-200-43]]; [[ESA Forms | Migratory Birds Form 3-200-13]]; [[Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Handbook | Section 7 Consultation Handbook]]; [[FWS - Habitat Conservation Plans and Incidental Take Permits webpage | Incidental Take Permit Overview]];[[BLM - Sage-Grouse and Sagebrush Conservation webpage | BLM Sage-Grouse and Sagebrush Conservation]] webpage;
Enter multiple References, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
[[Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act]]; [[The Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 | The Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972]]; [[Migratory Bird Treaty Act]]; [[Endangered Species Act]]; [[Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act]]
Enter multiple Regulations, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
Please provide the contact position or title. Use the drop down selection to find the appropriate contact.Options are listed in the format of: Organization: Position
Assemble a trigger using the fields below. Multiple triggers are treated as "OR" conditionals.
Surface ManagerSurface OwnerMineral ManagerMineral OwnerActivityEncroachmentEnvironmentalLocationLand Use PlanGeothermal LeaseHazardous WasteImpactsFacilityFundingManagedPlannedPower PlantTransmissionTransportation
DrillingExplorationGeophysicsLeasingPower Plant DevelopmentWell Abandonment
can be described as
CogenerationSmall Power ProductionIndependent Power ProductionWholesale CustomerFERC ExemptedFERC LicensedUnderground StorageAbove-Ground StorageTemporary Water RequirementPermanent Water RequirementDrinking Water Providing
ActiveNoApplicant Is Lessee
Capacity Exceeds 20 MWCapacity Under 20 MWCapacity Is 50 MWCapacity Exceeds 50 MWCapacity Under 100 MWPUC Certification
Historic PropertiesNative American Historic PropertyNative Hawaiian Historic PropertyNational Register Historic PropertyHistoric Property (Alteration)AirportMigratory BirdsBald Or Golden EagleMarine Mammals Or HabitatFederal Endangered SpeciesFarmland Or LivestockMilitary LandWaters Of The USNavigable WatersWild Or Scenic RiverWetlands By Dregging Or FillingGroundwater By DischargeStorm WaterWater Discharge To WellWater Discharge To LandWater Point Source DischargeWaste Water Associated With Only GeothermalReceived State 401 WQ CertHas Not Received 401 WQ CertAir QualityAir Quality From ConstructionAir Quality From OperationSolid Waste
Line Capacity Under 200 kVLine Capacity Exceeds 50 kVWithin NIETCCAISO GridExempt Per GO 131 D III B 1Not Exempt From CEQAPUC CertificationProject Under GO 131 D II B 2
Assessment CompletedImpact SignificantImpact Likely SignificantAnalysis Impacts AdverseAnalysis Impacts Not AdverseNo Best Interests FindingNo Categorical ExclusionNo Determination Of NEPA AdequacyPrior State AnalysisNo Prior State AnalysisProcess Not Complete For DrillingExtraordinary Circumstances
Interconnection AgreementPre-Application Process
State Highway ROW
Exceeds Max Length Or Load
Please note that all contributions to Open Energy Information are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Zero (see Creative Commons).
When contributing, you must abide with Open Energy Information's core content policies of neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research.
This is a minor edit
Watch this page
| Editing help