You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
Section number derived automatically from the wiki page. Move the page to change the section number.
Select the flowchart which accompanies this section.
Please check the technology the roadmap section applies to (select all that apply)
Select the hydropower project type
Information current as of
The year this permitting roadmap section was updated to current information.
In California, state cultural considerations are considered during the [[California Environmental Quality Act]] (CEQA) process. In determining whether a project may have a significant impact on the environment, CEQA regulations consider historical resources as part of the environment. ([[California Environmental Quality Act|Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21001(b)]]).
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), part of the [[State Historical Resources Commission]] has designed a program to identify, evaluate, register, and protect historical resources. The program lists four criteria for designating a historical resource. In order to be considered a significant historical resource the resource in question must:
* Be associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States;
* Be associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history;
* Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represent the work of a master, or possess high artistic values; or
* Have yielded, or have the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.
See [[Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5024.1(c)]].
A developer should contact the [[State Historical Resources Commission]] to determine if there are any listed historical resources within the proposed project site.
The [[California Register]] is an authoritative guide to California’s historical resources and establishes factors for considering what properties are considered significant for the purposes of CEQA. If the California Register has specifically listed a site or property as significant, the lead agency of a proposed project must determine if development will cause any adverse effects to the site or property. Although the California Register lists sites and properties as historical resources, a resource does not need to be listed in order to be considered a significant resource for the purposes of CEQA. In addition, local cities and counties may also designate certain areas as local historical resources. A developer should check with local authorities to determine the identity of any local historical resources.
See [[California Environmental Quality Act|Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21001(b)]]; [[Cal. Pub. Res. Code|Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5204.1(d)(5)]]; [[CEQA and Historical Resources Technical Assistance]].
Overview of the permit or section being discussed.
==11-CA-a.1 – Define Area of Potential Effect During CEQA Process==
While the lead agency is considering the environmental impacts, the cultural considerations must be addressed as well. Typically the developer retains an archaeologist and a historian to perform the analysis. Before the archaeologist and historian conduct any studies, the lead agency must define the area to be considered by the archaeologist and historian.
==11-CA-a.2 – Perform Literature Review==
The archaeologist and historian perform a literature review. The state repository is usually the site of the literature review. The literature review will alert the archaeologist to any cultural resources that have already been discovered.
==11-CA-a.3 – Conduct Surveys==
The archaeologist and historian study and survey the area of potential effect. A special permit may be required to conduct the survey.
==11-CA-a.4 – Draft Report==
Following the cultural survey, the archaeologist completes a draft report to include any potential effects as well as recommended mitigation measures.
==11-CA-a.5 – Review Draft Report==
The archaeologist and historian’s draft report will be reviewed by the lead agency in the CEQA process. The lead agency will determine whether the proposed project will cause a substantial adverse change to a historical resource. If the proposed project will cause a substantial adverse change, the lead agency may determine that the project causes a significant impact on the environment for CEQA purposes and the proposed project will not be able to continue as planned. A substantial adverse change includes the demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration in such a way that the significance of the historical resource would be impaired. See [[Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5020.1(q)]].
Other impacts that are normally considered significant are impacts that will:
* Disrupt or adversely affect a prehistoric or historic archeological site or a property of historic or cultural significance to a community or ethnic or social group; or a paleontological site except as part of a scientific study;
* Substantially disturb any area of possible cultural or historical significance; or
* Remove any structure determined to have historical significance.
See [[CEQA Environmental Review]].
==11-CA-a.6 to 11-CA-a.8 – Review Finding of the Lead Agency==
[[Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5020 et seq.: Historical Resources | Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5024(f)]] requires state agencies to submit documentation for any project having the potential to affect historical resources to the SHPO for comment. In addition, [[Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5020 et seq.: Historical Resources | Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5024.5]] requires state agencies to provide the SHPO with notice and a summary of a proposed action that will “alter the original or significant historical features or fabric, or transfer, relocate, or demolish historical resources on the master list maintained pursuant to [[Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5020 et seq.: Historical Resources | Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5024(d)]]…” [[14 CCR 15064.5: Determining the Significance of Impacts to Archaeological and Historical Resources |Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14 § 15064.5(b)(5)]] requires lead agencies to consult with the SHPO in accordance with [[Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5020 et seq.: Historical Resources | Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5024.5]] as part of the CEQA process. Consequently, the draft report should be submitted to the SHPO for review and comment.
==11-CA-a.9 – Letter of Concurrence==
If the SHPO reviews the draft report and agrees with the lead agency regarding the following:
* The presence of historical resources at the site;
* The potential adverse effects to historical resources; and
* The proposed mitigation measures, the SHPO sends a letter documenting its concurrence with the proposed action. See [[Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5020 et seq.: Historical Resources | Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5024.5(c)]]. Otherwise, the SHPO sends a letter requesting additional information in an attempt to resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved, the SHPO reports to the Office of Planning and Research for mediation. See [[Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5020 et seq.: Historical Resources | Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5024.5(d)]].
==11-CA-a.10 to 11-CA-a.11 – Are Historical Resources Present at the Project Site?==
If the draft report determines that there are no historical resources present at the site, there can be no significant effects. This should be noted in the CEQA document, but no further analysis is required.
==11-CA-a.12 – Will the Project Cause Substantial Adverse Changes That Can Be Avoided or Mitigated?==
If a proposed project will potentially cause a substantial adverse change to a historical resource, the lead agency in the CEQA process may require the developer to avoid or mitigate the change. Mitigation of significant impacts must lessen or eliminate the physical impact that the proposed project will have on the historical resource. A developer might consider redesigning the proposed project in order to avoid the objectionable or damaging aspects to the historical resource. The relocation of a historical resource may also be considered a mitigation measure, but the developer must consult with the lead agency to determine if this is a feasible option of mitigation or whether such a move would cause more damage to the historical resource. If the substantial adverse change to the historical resource can be avoided or mitigated, the lead agency may determine that the proposed project may continue as planned. The SHPO must concur with mitigation and avoidance measures. See 11-CA-a.6. See [[CEQA and Historical Resources Technical Assistance]].
==11-CA-a.13 – Incorporate Proposed Changes into the Project Plan and CEQA Analysis==
If there are changes that the lead agency of the CEQA process determines will mitigate or avoid the significant impact that the proposed project will have on a historical resource, the developer must incorporate these changes into the project plan and CEQA analysis. See [[CEQA and Historical Resources Technical Assistance]].
==11-CA-a.14 – Cultural Consideration Report==
After the lead agency for the CEQA process makes a final determination about the proposed project’s impacts on any historical resources, the lead agency issues a report containing its findings. The report will be added to any other CEQA documents that pertain to the proposed project. The cultural resource report helps the lead agency determine whether the proposed project will have a significant impact, no significant impact, or a mitigated impact on the environment. See [[California Environmental Quality Act|Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21000]].
==11-CA-a.15 – Include Report in CEQA Analysis==
The lead agency includes the report in the CEQA analysis. During the CEQA process, the public may comment on the CEQA documents including the cultural report. The report is also distributed to the SHPO and potentially interested Native Americans through the CEQA process.
Paragraphs supporting the elements in the flowchart. Delineate section headers with "==" wiki text.
Enter agency or multiple agencies, separated by semi-colons.
[[CEQA Environmental Review|California – CEQA Environmental Review]]; [[CEQA and Historical Resources Technical Assistance|California – CEQA and Historical Resources Technical Assistance]];
Enter multiple References, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
[[California Environmental Quality Act]]; [[Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5020 et seq.: Historical Resources | California – Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 5024 et seq., Historical Resources]]; [[California Environmental Quality Act|California – Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21000 et seq., Policy]]; [[14 CCR 15064.5: Determining the Significance of Impacts to Archaeological and Historical Resources | California – Ca. Code R. & Regs. tit. 14 § 15000 et seq., Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act]];
Enter multiple Regulations, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
Please provide the contact position or title. Use the drop down selection to find the appropriate contact.Options are listed in the format of: Organization: Position
Assemble a trigger using the fields below. Multiple triggers are treated as "OR" conditionals.
Surface ManagerSurface OwnerMineral ManagerMineral OwnerActivityEncroachmentEnvironmentalLocationLand Use PlanGeothermal LeaseHazardous WasteImpactsFacilityFundingManagedPlannedPower PlantTransmissionTransportation
DrillingExplorationGeophysicsLeasingPower Plant DevelopmentWell Abandonment
can be described as
CogenerationSmall Power ProductionIndependent Power ProductionWholesale CustomerFERC ExemptedFERC LicensedUnderground StorageAbove-Ground StorageTemporary Water RequirementPermanent Water RequirementDrinking Water Providing
ActiveNoApplicant Is Lessee
Capacity Exceeds 20 MWCapacity Under 20 MWCapacity Is 50 MWCapacity Exceeds 50 MWCapacity Under 100 MWPUC Certification
Historic PropertiesNative American Historic PropertyNative Hawaiian Historic PropertyNational Register Historic PropertyHistoric Property (Alteration)AirportMigratory BirdsBald Or Golden EagleMarine Mammals Or HabitatFederal Endangered SpeciesFarmland Or LivestockMilitary LandWaters Of The USNavigable WatersWild Or Scenic RiverWetlands By Dregging Or FillingGroundwater By DischargeStorm WaterWater Discharge To WellWater Discharge To LandWater Point Source DischargeWaste Water Associated With Only GeothermalReceived State 401 WQ CertHas Not Received 401 WQ CertAir QualityAir Quality From ConstructionAir Quality From OperationSolid Waste
Line Capacity Under 200 kVLine Capacity Exceeds 50 kVWithin NIETCCAISO GridExempt Per GO 131 D III B 1Not Exempt From CEQAPUC CertificationProject Under GO 131 D II B 2
Assessment CompletedImpact SignificantImpact Likely SignificantAnalysis Impacts AdverseAnalysis Impacts Not AdverseNo Best Interests FindingNo Categorical ExclusionNo Determination Of NEPA AdequacyPrior State AnalysisNo Prior State AnalysisProcess Not Complete For DrillingExtraordinary Circumstances
Interconnection AgreementPre-Application Process
State Highway ROW
Exceeds Max Length Or Load
Please note that all contributions to Open Energy Information are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Zero (see Creative Commons).
When contributing, you must abide with Open Energy Information's core content policies of neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research.
This is a minor edit
Watch this page
| Editing help