You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
Section number derived automatically from the wiki page. Move the page to change the section number.
Select the flowchart which accompanies this section.
Please check the technology the roadmap section applies to.
Select the hydropower project type
Information current as of
The year this permitting roadmap section was updated to current information.
A solar developer should conduct an onsite evaluation in order to identify site-specific resource protection concerns and requirements. The developer should contact the managing agency for further permit and regulation requirements that might be needed before the approval of any proposed activity.
Overview of the permit or section being discussed.
==10.1 - Site Visit==
The site visit is essential to viewing the location(s) of the proposed activity: access roads, drill pad locations, and other planned infrastructure. Areas of proposed surface disturbance need to be flagged/staked in order to determine any additional environmental and cultural surveys, and whether [[National Historic Preservation Act | NHPA]] Section 106 and [[National Environmental Policy Act | NEPA]] Section 7 consultations will be required. The site visit also affords the opportunity to determine if lease stipulations can be modified, excepted, or waved.
This visit, as part of a pre-application or application process is the basis for the [[National Environmental Policy Act | NEPA]] documentation necessary for the permit approval.
==10.2 to 10.3 - Are There Potential Impacts to Tribes or Cultural Resources?==
Native American or tribal cultural issues may arise whether the proposed project will be located on or off reservations. Further environmental review will be necessary if the evaluation results in a discovery of a possible impact on Tribes and cultural resources.
During construction, the discovery of artifacts, and especially an Indian burial site, must be reported to the state historic preservation office, likely triggering additional regulatory involvement. Additionally, Section 106 of NHPA requires that all federal agencies take into account the effects of their actions on historic properties. Federal agencies must then provide the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation with an opportunity to comment on those actions.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/11|Cultural Resource Assessment: 11]]</span>
==10.4 to 10.5 - Are There Potential Impacts to Biological Resources?==
The presence of endangered species on the site for a project will result in further environmental evaluation being required. Under the [[Endangered Species Act]], Federal agencies are required to conduct a Biological Assessment to ensure that any actions they undertake do not jeopardize the existence of any listed species. If a listed species or critical habitat is likely to be affected, the agency must provide the [[Fish and Wildlife Service]] with an evaluation on the likely effects of the action. ([[Title 50 CFR 402 Interagency Cooperation - Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Amended|50 CFR 402]]). This is required for any Federal actions that may significantly affect the quality of the human environment.
Biological Evaluations may serve multiple purposes, but the primary role is to document an agency’s conclusions and the rationale to support those conclusions regarding the effects of their proposed actions on protected resources. Federal agencies may conduct this section 7 biological assessment as part of the [[National Environmental Policy Act | NEPA]] analysis.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12|Biological Resource Assessment Process: 12]]</span>
==10.6 to 10.7 - Are There Potential Impacts to Pre-Existing Land Uses?==
Preexisting, existing, and concurrent land uses at and surrounding the site are critical considerations in the early planning stages of the project. Federal and state law may prohibit or limit interference with certain land uses. For instance, developers should consider impacts on nearby airports, military lands, navigable waters, floodplains, wetlands, coastal zones, and Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE) managed structures. If the proposed project impacts these land uses, then further environmental review and/or permitting will be required.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/13|Land Use Assessment Process: 13]]</span>
==10.8 to 10.9 - Are There Potential Impacts to Waters of the United States?==
Water quality of nearby surface and groundwater must be maintained within state and federal standards during construction and operation of the solar facility. Chemical limits, temperature standards, consumption and flow levels are set to ensure safe environments for natural wildlife to thrive. State Departments of Public Health and Environment are often responsible for discharge permits and water quality issues. The [[Clean Water Act]] (CWA) establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the "waters of the United States" and regulating quality standards for surface waters.
Water quality of nearby surface and groundwater must be maintained within state and federal standards during construction and operation of the power plant. Often both chemical limits and temperature standards are set to ensure safe environments for natural wildlife to thrive. Often state Departments of Public Health and Environment are responsible for discharge permits. Water quality issues will be addressed in environmental assessments (EA) and environmental impact statements (EIS) developed for compliance with the [[National Environmental Policy Act]] (NEPA).
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/14|Water Resource Assessment: 14]]</span>
'''Waters of the United States'''
"Waters of the United States" is defined by regulation under the Clean Water Rule as developed by the [[United States Environmental Protection Agency]] (EPA) and [[U.S. Army Corps of Engineers]] (USACE). “Waters of the United States” is defined to include:
*The territorial seas, and waters which are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;
*Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters; and
*Adjacent wetlands. [[Title 33 CFR 328 Definition of the Waters of the United States|33 C.F.R. § 328.3(a)]].
Tributaries must be perennial or intermittent within a typical year, which the rule defines as a year "when precipitation and other climatic variables are within the normal periodic range for the geographic area of the applicable aquatic resource based on a rolling thirty-year period." [[Title 33 CFR 328 Definition of the Waters of the United States|33 C.F.R. § 328.3(c)(13)]].
"Waters of the United States" do not include:
*Waters or water features that are not identified in paragraph (a)(1), (2), (3), or (4) of this section;
*Groundwater, including groundwater drained through subsurface drainage systems;
*Ephemeral features, including ephemeral streams, swales, gullies, rills, and pools;
*Diffuse stormwater run-off and directional sheet flow over upland;
*Ditches that are not waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section, and those portions of ditches constructed in waters identified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section that do not satisfy the conditions of paragraph (c)(1) of this section;
*Prior converted cropland;
*Artificially irrigated areas, including fields flooded for agricultural production, that would revert to upland should application of irrigation water to that area cease;
*Artificial lakes and ponds, including water storage reservoirs and farm, irrigation, stock watering, and log cleaning ponds, constructed or excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters, so long as those artificial lakes and ponds are not impoundments of jurisdictional waters that meet the conditions of paragraph (c)(6) of this section;
*Water-filled depressions constructed or excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters incidental to mining or construction activity, and pits excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters for the purpose of obtaining fill, sand, or gravel;
*Stormwater control features constructed or excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters to convey, treat, infiltrate, or store stormwater run-off;
*Groundwater recharge, water reuse, and wastewater recycling structures, including detention, retention, and infiltration basins and ponds, constructed or excavated in upland or in non-jurisdictional waters; and
*Waste treatment systems. [[Title 33 CFR 328 Definition of the Waters of the United States|33 C.F.R. § 328.3(b)]].
Developers should be aware of ongoing litigation on this matter and continue to monitor the issue at the state and national level. For example, the state of Colorado won a preliminary injunction preventing the new WOTUS definition going into effect in the state. The EPA provides up-to-date information on the [[Environmental Protection Agency - Clean Water Rule Website]].
==10.10 to 10.11 - Are There Potential Impacts to Air Quality?==
Developers must evaluate the impact their project will have on air quality in order to comply with [[Clean Air Act]] requirements. Developers will be required to comply with state drafted rules used to implement the federal [[Clean Air Act]] at the state level. Air quality impacts of the proposed project must be evaluated to determine if air pollution may result. If the evaluation reveals that air pollution impacts will result from the project, then further examination and an air quality permit will be required.
==10.12 to 10.13 - Are There Potential Impacts to Geological Resources?==
Solar projects may have impact on geology, soils, and paleontological resources. Due to this, the developer must assess the potential impacts the project may have to these resources. The site must be evaluated to determine if there are potential impacts on geological resources in the area as a result of the project. The [[Paleontological Resources Preservation Act]] (PRPA) outlines the requirements for obtaining a permit to collect paleontological resources on land controlled by the [[Bureau of Land Management]].
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/16|Geological Resources Assessment Process: 16]]</span>
==10.14 to 10.15 - Are There Potential Impacts to Aesthetic Resources?==
The [[Wild and Scenic Rivers Act]] was passed with the purpose to protect rivers of a particular scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural or other similar values from impact on their free-flowing condition. The project site must be evaluated to determine if any such rivers will be impacted as a result of the project. If the project will impact a designated river, then further environment review and/or permitting may be required. It also may impede the developer's ability to get a license to construct transmission lines or other project works. Developers should also consult the applicable state laws dealing with aesthetic resources that may be impacted as a result of the project.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/17|Aesthetic Resource Assessment: 17]]</span>
==10.16 to 10.17 - Will the Project Create or Store Waste and/or Hazardous Materials?==
The [[United States Environmental Protection Agency]] (EPA) is authorized to manage hazardous waste through the [[Resource Conservation and Recovery Act]] (RCRA). Projects dealing with storage or creation of waste and/or hazardous materials must be evaluated. This overall evaluation includes examination of the use of underground and above ground storage tanks, production of hazardous waste, and disposal of solid wastes produced as a result of the project. If the project will create or store waste and/or hazardous materials, then the developer may be required to obtain a permit or go through further environmental review.
<span class="btn btn-rapid btn-overview">[[RAPID/Roadmap/18|Waste and Hazardous Material Assessment Process: 18]]</span>
==10.18 - Other Considerations (Environmental Justice, Flood Plains, Etc.)==
While the above elements and narrative cover the most frequent considerations, there may be other necessary considerations. For example, the EPA has a policy of promoting environmental justice: involving the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people involved regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. In practice, this policy serves to ensure that minority and/or lower income communities are not disproportionately affected adversely by negative externalities of environmental projects. For example, constructing numerous waste facilities in a predominantly low-income community, where that community did not receive fair treatment or meaningful involvement in the process, would likely violate the EPA's policy of Environmental Justice. For more information, see the [[EPA - Environmental Justice webpage | EPA Environmental Justice website]].
In addition, developers may need to consider the presence of flood plains within or near the project location. Under [[Executive Order 11988 - Floodplain Management | Executive Order 11988]], each federal agency is required to take action to reduce the risk of flood loss, to minimize the impact of floods on human safety, health and welfare, and to restore and preserve the values of floodplains. If a proposed project is located within a floodplain, then federal agencies are required to take specific actions during environmental review under the [[National Environmental Policy Act]] (NEPA). For example, the federal agency will be required to consider alternatives to avoid adverse effects and incompatible development in floodplains areas.
Paragraphs supporting the elements in the flowchart. Delineate section headers with "==" wiki text.
Enter agency or multiple agencies, separated by semi-colons.
[[Environmental Protection Agency - Clean Water Rule Website]]
Enter multiple References, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
[[Endangered Species Act]];
[[Clean Water Act]];
[[Clean Air Act]];
[[National Environmental Policy Act]];
[[Title 50 CFR 402 Interagency Cooperation - Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Amended|50 CFR 402]];
[[Executive Order 13778– Restoring the Rule of Law, Federalism, and Economic Growth by Reviewing the Waters of the United States Rule]];
[[Title 40 CFR 230 Definitions - Clean Water Act|40 CFR 230.3(s)]];
[[Title 33 CFR 328 Definition of the Waters of the United States|33 CFR 328]];
[[Ohio, et al. v. EPA, Order of Stay]]
Enter multiple Regulations, separated by semi-colons. Use standard wiki text for links.
Please provide the contact position or title. Use the drop down selection to find the appropriate contact.Options are listed in the format of: Organization: Position
Assemble a trigger using the fields below. Multiple triggers are treated as "OR" conditionals.
Surface ManagerSurface OwnerMineral ManagerMineral OwnerActivityEncroachmentEnvironmentalLocationLand Use PlanGeothermal LeaseHazardous WasteImpactsFacilityFundingManagedPlannedPower PlantTransmissionTransportation
DrillingExplorationGeophysicsLeasingPower Plant DevelopmentWell Abandonment
can be described as
CogenerationSmall Power ProductionIndependent Power ProductionWholesale CustomerFERC ExemptedFERC LicensedUnderground StorageAbove-Ground StorageTemporary Water RequirementPermanent Water RequirementDrinking Water Providing
ActiveNoApplicant Is Lessee
Capacity Exceeds 20 MWCapacity Under 20 MWCapacity Is 50 MWCapacity Exceeds 50 MWCapacity Under 100 MWPUC Certification
Historic PropertiesNative American Historic PropertyNative Hawaiian Historic PropertyNational Register Historic PropertyHistoric Property (Alteration)AirportMigratory BirdsBald Or Golden EagleMarine Mammals Or HabitatFederal Endangered SpeciesFarmland Or LivestockMilitary LandWaters Of The USNavigable WatersWild Or Scenic RiverWetlands By Dregging Or FillingGroundwater By DischargeStorm WaterWater Discharge To WellWater Discharge To LandWater Point Source DischargeWaste Water Associated With Only GeothermalReceived State 401 WQ CertHas Not Received 401 WQ CertAir QualityAir Quality From ConstructionAir Quality From OperationSolid Waste
Line Capacity Under 200 kVLine Capacity Exceeds 50 kVWithin NIETCCAISO GridExempt Per GO 131 D III B 1Not Exempt From CEQAPUC CertificationProject Under GO 131 D II B 2
Assessment CompletedImpact SignificantImpact Likely SignificantAnalysis Impacts AdverseAnalysis Impacts Not AdverseNo Best Interests FindingNo Categorical ExclusionNo Determination Of NEPA AdequacyPrior State AnalysisNo Prior State AnalysisProcess Not Complete For DrillingExtraordinary Circumstances
Interconnection AgreementPre-Application Process
State Highway ROW
Exceeds Max Length Or Load
Please note that all contributions to Open Energy Information are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Zero (see Creative Commons).
When contributing, you must abide with Open Energy Information's core content policies of neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research.
This is a minor edit
Watch this page
| Editing help